Added: March,6th 2008

Rate: 4.65

Views: 2468

Desciption: This refined version of 911 AMATEUR part3 was - ironically - inspired by the so-called "debunkers" of my research. As it became clear that the surface which apparently "reflects" Evan Fairbanks' "airplane" is indeed a car windscreen, we have the ultimate proof Evan's shot is 100% fake. That "reflection" was a silly idea by the inept creator of this forgery who most likely was thinking of his fishing days at the lake where trees are mirrored upside down in the water. The ineptitude of the "911 video forgery team" is thus established. It may be difficult to take in that such incompetence could go unnoticed in such a well-funded military operation - but this is what we have and what emerges from the close scrutiny of their wretched false-flag operation. THIS IS A VIDEO ANALYSIS of 4 so-called "AMATEUR" shots of "flight 175" hitting WTC2 on 9/11. THE SHOTS ARE CREDITED TO : 1 : Evan Fairbanks 2 : Luc Courchesne 3 : Michael Hezarkhani 4 : Tina Cart MOST RELEVANT POINTS TO FOCUS ON IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS THIS VIDEO : SHOT 1 : Fairbanks' video has many oddities. The first is that the airplane melts into the tower with NOTHING - not even the aft assembly - BREAKING OFF. The second (impossible reflection in car windshield)simply establishes the complete ineptitude of the authors of this forgery. SHOTS 2 & 3 : Both these shots show, on 'plane' impact, two explosions on the tower (over and under right wingtip). If these are not shape charges planted in the tower, WHAT are they ? SHOT 4 : The stripes on the World Trade Centers are extremely bright - even though they are in shade. This ALONE exposes this shot as a forgery. Not ? If you should disagree, please explain. THE PROOF OF VIDEO MANIPULATION OF THE OFFICIAL 9/11 FOOTAGE IS NOW FIRMLY ESTABLISHED. ANY SINCERE TRUTHSEEKER SHOULD KEEP THIS IN MIND AND REALIZE THIS IS THE MOST SOLID PROOF WE ARE LEFT WITH TO EXPOSE THE PERPETRATORS OF THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS TV HOAX EVER PLAYED UPON MANKIND. In my honest opinion, the plane/no plane debate is now over. Let's move on and see how this evidence can be brought to a court of law. 911 AMATEUR part1 : http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM 911 AMATEUR part2 : http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yjQmxS-DpyM For more info on how the 9/11 TV fakery was carried out, please watch: SEPTEMBER CLUES (part1-8) http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice